Motions in Meeting Minutes
When doing meeting minutes training for non-profits, I get asked about
how to spot a motion to put in notes and how to put it in the draft of minutes.
How to note a motion during
the meeting? A correctly stated motion starts with “I move,”
“we move,” or “the committee moves.” Occasionally,
you might hear it put as “... would like to make a motion to…” which according
to parliamentary rules is incorrect - but it does get the idea across. This beginning of a motion may be put into
the secretary’s or recorder’s notes, however it is not put into the official minutes
unless it is seconded, discussed, revised, then voted on and approved/carried. Per parliamentary rules, negative decisions (motions
not passed) are not recorded in minutes.
However those decisions may be in handwritten notes and then later
marked through so they do not accidentally in the minutes.
When to publish a motion in meeting
minutes? Per parliamentary rules, only positive decisions
carried by majority (or unanimous) vote are put into minutes. Why? Because a failed or incomplete motion
may be brought up again at another meeting once it has been researched and
revised, at which time it may get passed.
When to use names in
published motions? Although you may state the name of person who
first brought the motion to the attention of the voting body - if you wish it
on-the-record, it is not necessary to mention who seconded or suggested amendments
(revisions/changes) during discussions. Why?
According to parliamentary procedures, a motion should not be debated or
discussed unless seconded. Once
seconded, it can be discussed and revised followed by a call to vote. Once a motion begins discussion, it belongs
to the entire body and therefore no additional names in the process are relevant. In other words, the motion process is typically:
Move, 2nd, Debate/Revise, and
Vote. Although I have seen groups
who prefer to do it more like a team as they feel it goes faster to: Move, Brainstorm/Discuss, 2nd, and
Vote.
How to write a motion in the
meeting minutes? A complete motion will be a statement that answers
all the appropriate the 5W’s (who, what, where, when, and why). Below is an example motion for minutes and
how it may be amended in future meetings.
The text in [brackets] is optional.
MOTION [by Susan?]: The Rewards and
Recognition Committee resolves to hold the Annual Awards Ceremony
at a location (facility TBD) that can
hold 500 people for a maximum facility cost of $2,000 in Autumn (date TBD)
using a program similar to last year in order to thank high achievement participation
during current fiscal year. Motion carried [unanimously OR by
majority vote #’s?].
NOTES:
1. If this motion is in the committee minutes and
their name appears at the top of minutes, it is not necessary to repeat their
name within the motion.
2. TBD (T-B-D, to be determined) within the minutes indicates an amendment will
be made later when more data is finalized.
Although committee and sub-team minutes may contain TBDs, board or officer
minutes should never have a TBD as they tend to make final decisions.
*From example above, simplify the amendment
process in the following meeting where the committee will select a location
from 2-3 places that meet their criteria.
MOTION to Amend: Committee resolves to hold the Annual Awards Ceremony
at New York Regency Hotel - Royalty Ballroom in autumn (date TBD) using a
program similar to last year to thank high-achievement participants during current
fiscal year. Motion carried.
*From example above, the committee gets
3 possible dates from the hotel and then rewrites the decision below in another
meeting to show the date that best fits their calendar.
MOTION to Amend: Resolves to hold the
Annual Awards Ceremony at New York Regency Hotel - Royalty Ballroom on October
15 using a program similar to last year to thank high-achievement participants during
current fiscal year. Motion carried.
The “MOTION to Append” example above are the easiest way to amend past motions because each
subsequent meeting is a new decision based on one made in a previous meeting
using “to append” clearly indicates this path, Using TBD to indicate future
changes is also much clearer and easier than having to go back to first occurrence
of the decision, amend the minutes and re-approve minutes. If choosing
to follow the parliamentary process to amend a previous decision in old minutes,
the committee would have to use the following markings which could make the
minutes harder to read and understand: Additions/Insertions must be in Italics,
and Deletions/Removals should be indicated with [Brackets]
Labels:
communication,
decision making,
meetings,
organize,
process
Bookmark this post:
|
More... |
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment