In reading the book
Reviving
America (
on Amazon #ad) by
Steve Forbes (editor
of
Forbes
Magazine) I found his ideas on the gold standard for money interesting. As well as sensible, after all we must agree the
fluctuation in dollar values can bring down an economy where government just prints
more money rather than backing it with value-based gold.
In part three, Forbes shares “If the U.S. and global economy
is ever to fully rebound, we must return to a monetary system based on a sound dollar. Allow today’s destructive policies to
continue, and the nation faces a disheartening future of sub-par growth,
declining living standards, slowing upward mobility, and growing
discontent. America will no longer be a
bountiful land of opportunity for people who want to better their lives and
improve the prospects of the children and grandchildren.”
To support that statement, he gives the example that what the
government’s desired 2% inflation rate means
to a family making $50,000 (which is supposed to be lower than
median income level of 53K,
although individual per capita is less than 29K) a year means their cost of
living goes up $1,000. How does having
$1K less help this family spend more to boost the economy?
What does this have to do with the gold standard? In part 3, chapter 12 Forbes gives
understandable briefs on three different gold standards and highlights the
benefits of each. Then he proposes a
hybrid
that includes the best of each method and how it should be set into motion.
Another example in part three was credit given to small businesses
(BTW:
SBO is where the job market is going) in the past five years grew only
6%. It is nearly impossible for these
businesses to get loans based on the current reserve restriction. Whereas credit increases to government is at 36%
and 32% to corporations/big business. How
does that build business commerce and encourage innovation?
No comments:
Post a Comment